Creamy Cervical Discharge When Pregnant

SELL ITALIAN TERRITORY

now know, is a crisis. So are measures to combat it. Support to the poor, social safety nets, support to productive sectors in crisis and now deregulation in their building, which the government should revive the fortunes of the industry development and thus support the Italian GDP, now in decline.

But as proposed by the government to lift the economy raises some questions: a plan for the building (called "house plan" would be an insult) using deregulation as an incentive to enable work on construction sites and existing buildings. The matter is a regional responsibility, with the exception of the principles, and the time when the Lantern goes to press an agreement was reached between the Government and the Regions, which is binding for the latter, but was not selected as the instrument to be presented in parliament (the draft law or decree).

Under the agreement reached on April 1, which, as explained in the press will have a smaller impact than the earlier draft, on the one hand you want it quicker to obtain of the building permit, replacing it with self ( the Complaint Commencement Activities, already in place for minor building work), on the other hand if you want to allow a restructuring of a house single or two-family, an increase in volumes of 20%, while in the case of demolition and reconstruction of a building with green building techniques there is a premium of 35% by volume. These increases, which would have a limit of 200 cubic meters, according to the agreement would occur notwithstanding the urban plans, though with limited opportunity to identify the areas where these transformations. Finally, for those who decided to make the changes in the dimension to their homes would be provided for an additional reward of 50% normal contribution to the municipality calculated the cost of construction.

A first comment concerns the abolition, for this type of work, the building permit, which leaves some doubt about the real need for simplification in this sense , demonstrated the activity building very intense in recent years, albeit with the old rules.

On the other hand we must not forget that the territory and the landscape are common goods, so they belong to the community, unlike soil, which can be privately owned. So if any owner, with exception to the master plan, is it possible to increase the volume of his house - whether in urban, mountainous or coastal - with larger volumes, are produced negative externalities , that negative consequences are procured at the expense of the community.

The many statements of the supporters of this measure seem to forget these fundamental principles, claiming a large collection operation based on the principle of political consensus at home that you can do what you want and on a false opposition between the normative constraints (often required to reduce the negative externalities and protect the common good) and freedom.

So even if it were true that this move is the trump card to lift the country out of crisis, on the other hand to achieve this in the board would be unacceptably undermined the territory of our country, already sufficiently urbanized in modo spesso insostenibile.

Lasciamo ai paesi in via di sviluppo la crescita del PIL con l'espansione edilizia incontrollata e pensiamo a realizzare uno sviluppo sostenibile che garantisca anche alle generazioni future adeguate risorse territoriali.

Denis Gervasoni  (tratto da lanterna numero 28)