My Medication Causes Nausea

FIRST CONGRESS FGS LOMBARDY

Il giorno 10 Maggio,a partire dalle ore 10.00, presso le ex cucine economiche in via Montegrappa 8, si terrà il congresso fondativo della FGS Lombardia. Siete tutti invitati.

Saranno presenti ed interverranno Luigi Iorio , segretario FGS nazionale, Pia Locatelli , MEP, and numerous other guests from the political youth.

Come along!

For more information please write an 'e-mail to fgsmilano@gmail.com

Skamper Pop Up Campers

TESTAMENTO BIOLOGICO

Look for Bioethics - Section of Verona

PRESS RELEASE

TESTAMENT TESTAMENT IDEOLOGICAL OR BIOLOGICAL?

Verona, April 2, 2009

On March 26 the Senate approved the bill on living wills Calabro. The law has been reinforced by the majority, who did not accept any amendment proposed by the opposition, emptied of any meaning the work of Parliament. The text sent now to the House of Representatives has even more stringent standards than those previously contestate.Una law unconstitutional and undemocratic.

Calabrò The law is undemocratic because it violates the freedom of citizens. This provides that artificial nutrition and hydration (tube naso-gastric) are always mandatory for all patients, conscious and unconscious. Despite the international and Italian scientific community considers the naso-gastric medical treatment, a medical act, so it is not for this law, which generally means as a form of life support, and as such the doctor can not deny no. In addition, the DDL provides that can not be interrupted treatment already undertaken, if this may sometimes cause death. Approved by the DDL are missing too many references to the figure of the Trustee, in its reduced role tended to enforce the will of the patient.

This law does not protect freedom of treatment, but requires health, forced to live indefinitely, even without any hope of recovery.

E 'clear to many lawyers as it is a law unconstitutional, since it contrasts with the art. 13, which guarantees inviolability of personal freedom, and art. 32, which ensures informed consent (also provided by art. 34 of the Code of Medical Ethics), namely the protection of the right to consent and to refuse surgery, drugs, etc.., Even lifesaving, those without which death can occur.

a law against living wills

This law is anti-historical because it takes us away once again from Europe, EU and international biolaw which enshrines the right to self-determination of the patient as a priority over the duty of the physician to cure him. In the countries of the laws on living wills are a long time (Belgium, Holland, France, Spain, Germany, England), and in all, reaffirming the right of patients to consent or refuse treatment. This is the reason that

led some of us to demand a law on wills biological in Italy: to avoid having

more appeal to supranational law and to give, once and for all, the legal value will

early treatment, as an act of responsibility. Who would have imagined that the outcome instead

would have been exactly the opposite? Calabro Law leaves no room for doubt: the living will is not binding on the doctor who is treating the patient. Your doctor will decide whether to take this into account and to the best knowledge and belief, you can disregard them (medical paternalism).

Calabro Law is not a law on living wills, and anti-law: an ideological manifesto which aims to ensure that Italians do not fill out his declaration early treatment because both could be useless.

So what's the stress in the text of the law the recognition of informed consent, then decide if the doctor and the patient? What is the point writing that recognizes and guarantees the

dignity of the person in priority to the interest of society and applications of

technology and science, then if the introduction of the oral or naso-gastric surgical

and as a result of drugs, proteins, electrolytes, etc.., They can not refuse? Not to mention that for some cancer patients in terminal state, hydration leads to an increase of suffering and may even hasten death. But who wrote and voted for this DDL that is not affected. Nourish and hydrate the time, even when the body naturally rejects it. In patients unable to absorb naturally. Furthermore, the goal is not to make a law that helps people.

We are witnessing the transformation of the democratic state in a state of ethics, which requires for

law what is good and what is bad for our souls and our bodies. The Italian state may (will) seize the patients to keep them artificially alive to the bitter end, through the forced introduction of the nasogastric tube and the retention of unwanted treatment and care against their will.

Life unavailable or available?

My life is down to me, order today to the Italian, when I want

nature take its course and lead me to death (the result, inter alia, to which no living being

can escape), but it seems very well available from politics, I to retain power in

hospital against my will, even if expressed publicly and validated by a notary. Of course, those who wish to be kept alive artificially must be protected and safeguarded. No one wants to "switch off" to anyone. But, equally, who, in keeping with his personal beliefs, not interested, too, should be protected and safeguarded in a democratic state.

In our country more and more illiberal, the hope is that old and new politicians to notice that bioethics is not a subject like any other. It touches the depths of us, the way we feel and see life, the world, and death. The hope is that they understand that no politician can be substituted for another's consciousness, if it is really democratic and secular state model in which we live.

The principle of secularism is the only guarantee that the dialogue between the various ethical and the necessary separation between morality and law. The defense of an ethical pluralism and bioethical is a mirror of good democracy, where it preserves the freedom of thought and expression, it stimulates the confrontation, we seek common principles on which to base political action, become sensitized citizens to be active participation in the social arena, they defend the fundamental human rights in the knowledge that nobody in the castle of life, has keys that open the door of truth.

Look for Bioethics - Section of Verona

Coordinators

Sara Patuzzo

Alberto Turkish

Wrestling Ring Blueprints

THE DANGER 'OF CELL PHONE DRIVING SCHOOLS

Many of us (too) think it's an exaggeration to conclude that the cell phone driving is dangerous: here's the proof.

by Ansa.it
19/04/2009 17:13
USA: OFF-ROAD TO ANSWER PHONE, 5 CHILDREN DIE

WASHINGTON - Five children died drowned in a car over off-road in a channel in Houston, Texas, after the driver lost control of the vehicle to try to answer a call your mobile. The man, a father of four of the five victims, and a second adult who was in the car managed to get out of the Lincoln Towncar and to safety. But only a little girl of ten, including six children who were in the car, was rescued before drowning in the waters of Green's Bayou, a local channel. The victims are two girls, one and three years, three males and four, six and seven years. A Houston police spokesman John Cannon told CNN that the driver of the vehicle has failed an alcohol test and is now under investigation: could an indictment for driving under the influence of alcohol and homicide.

.... and do not say it's fate!

Private Campgrounds In California

LA “QUESTIONE SICUREZZA” NELLE CITTA’

What is a "security issue"? Behind this Macroproblems opposing political forces and ideas collide on a field certainly not easy. By the bombardment of the media, political propaganda, the fear that spreads in an increasingly open and globalized world, the "security issue" evades clear definition. Everyone can interpret and reinterpret the events in his own way, giving different perspectives, twisted or distorted.

Nel panorama politico italiano la “questione sicurezza” ha rappresentato uno dei capisaldi della lotta politica delle destre. Cavalcando l’onda di una società spaventata, partiti come la Lega sono riusciti a conquistare fette di elettorato sempre più consistenti e le campagne elettorali ne hanno fatto un punto cardine. Da destra si richiama l’ordine, la polizia, il manganello, le ronde. E’ una risposta: portare agenti e controllori nelle strade così che le persone possano essere tenute al sicuro da aggressioni, rapine o peggio. Da sinistra si sottolineano i dati in diminuzione di rapine e crimini più svariati, ma una risposta chiara, forte e precisa never heard. There is an idea, though, where you can find all those who define themselves as belonging to "left": the company recovers the crime, society needs to heal itself.

The question which I will not come as a party rather than another to react to the "security issue", but what is really the "security issue". Well, I think it is perception. Perception why? Why is not the robbery that show us the TG or the data reduction in crimes other than to measure how much security there is in the streets and cities. The "security issue" concerns all the people who no longer trust that they are afraid to leave the house or set out in the streets known as "disreputable" or be alone at night at a certain time. The security issue is not the thief who threatens me, but the perception that I have nell'incamminarmi in the street by day and night, at any time. The perception was that once an individual has become in recent years the phenomenon of mass society as a whole, now, he feels insecure in the streets. I apologize for how many times I will use again the term "perception", but the fundamental concept around which I write.

There is no doubt that the media have done nothing but increase this widespread perception (and do not want to talk about politicians, that this argument is built entire careers), but the answer is not counter, counter always with the proposals and the data of a part or the other. The answer is to work for the company, and cancel its "widespread perception". And this is another big step: how to delete a concentrate of fear and negative perceptions? Certainly not forming patrols, or by sending the military to the city. These moves can erase the problem in a street in an area all the time in they pass the vigilantes, then that happens? People feel safer because there are more clubs or military boots trample the soil? I think not.

On the street there must be people, citizens, the true inhabitants of the city. When the left talks about "solving the problem of security through the company" does not start words in the wind (I am using left without naming any party: I'm talking about the ideas that form the substratum of the macro-area we call the left), or look in the abstract the problem by giving an answer equally abstract: the left speaks of an idea, the idea that citizens are to create security for themselves.

Let me explain. Area, a road, an entire neighborhood should not be left to itself, but must be "cultivated", improved, used, exploited. Use any word can replace the previous: What I mean is that we have to use the spaces that are ours, because we are citizens and the city is made up of people, not by roads and concrete.

areas where the perception of greater safety are divided into two main groups: the area illuminated by the headlights of police cars, and the areas where people come out, run, walk, or you are having fun. I prefer the latter. Where there are people, not spread crime. Where there is life there is no crime. It 'an assumption quite plausible.

Then reconnect everything. The "security issue" is based on perceptions of society. If a company feels the insecurity of a place, this place will be left to itself, abandoned to become something really insecure. What are the tools that can reconstitute the social fabric safe and livable and reverse the perception? The people. People as means and as ends: all efforts to improve their quality of life. People can go out, can find themselves, can create a social fabric not undermined by criminals both large and small. How? Stepping out of the house, make their area, their own ways, their city its living space, your home. Public spirit, and entertainment venues, the desire to create something here that I consider winning combination.

I wrote too much, I reiterated. I spoke in the abstract, this is true, now I want to get in this case. Provo with a proposal. In one area there are no pubs or places to meet, people do not go out and have a fear a ritrovarsi sole perché non vi è nessuno per strada. C’è un locale in disuso che nessuno ha più utilizzato; oppure c’è un edificio al cui interno troviamo una sala completamente libera. Magari gli abitanti del posto si sono sempre rifiutati di accogliere pub o locali per evitare rumori notturni. Cosa farne però di quella sala? Le idee sono molte: un luogo di ritrovo, un piccolo cinema, un teatro dove giovani compagnie propongono i loro spettacoli. Perché no? Cultura, divertimento, magari anche solo un punto di riferimento per una serata che non si sa come passare. La gente comincia ad uscire, le persone cominciano ad utilizzare quelle strade che sono loro di diritto. Si crea un circolo virtuoso: magari qualche bar rimane open late, maybe a couple decides to take a walk without worrying about time or place, maybe the youth of the area are found in a gathering point for canceling the cold indifference of every day. My proposal can be a simple, banal, perhaps may not like it. But the proposals may be larger, they can grow and develop, from a small seed into a majestic oak. The important thing is to want it.

Alessio Mazzucco

Types Of Colonial Ships

BIBLIOTECHE RIONALI

The social function of libraries has been historically underestimated and does not end even in the important area equipped and used to read or study that they offer. Libraries are also a place to socialize and exchange meaningful, usable not only by students but also to a bigger audience variegata.Le district library will also play a significant role in development of the territory, that in a city high-density device, such as Milan , it would be foolish not to consider .

Only a few, too few libraries have flexible schedules and are able to ensure an efficient and cittadini.Attualmente to complete the numbers are discouraging, only five libraries on twenty-six offer a night time, however, closing the ventidue.Discorso then separately for the opening Sunday, which is not provided for any of the twenty six cases already citati.Risulta therefore clear how it can be difficult if not impossible, the use of the important library services by the many student-workers in Milan.

We are asking to be allowed a greater number of neighborhood libraries to adopt an exercise serale.Chiediamo also encouraged to be open on Sundays.

develop this important municipal service is to be close to people's needs, means to rehabilitate degraded peripheral spaces, it's responding to important issues proactively and efficiente.Una good administration should do it, we will make sure that it does.

Pain Under Left Side Ribs

SOCIALISTI E RADICALI PER IL TESTAMENTO BIOLOGICO

On March 26 the Italian Senate approved a bill that allow doctors to keep alive any individual is in a vegetative state, regardless from the previous will of the same.

This is yet another step back in Italian politics that has proven once again unable to defend the values \u200b\u200bthat go beyond the albeit important laicità.La law that the government wants to impose on his by now "subjects" is unconstitutional because the constitution itself provides that "no citizen shall be subjected to medical treatment against his will." E 'paradoxical because it fails in an attempt not to consider a therapy that involves inserting a tube into the stomach, a medical treatment. E 'illogical as proposed without any involvement of the community medica.Soprattutto But the result is alarming because the emotional wave, fueled by a community never so blind and biased media, following the recent death of Eluana.

Young Socialists Milanesi We will endeavor to keep alive the debate by collecting signatures for the Luca Coscioni association, in order to bring to parliament the many voices of dissent in this latest attack on individual liberties of every citizen. We will do this together with the comrades of the Radicals' Association Enzo Tortora, regardless of the logical party that we should see far away with the elections to porte.Lo because we are battles that must be fought beyond the political election, because they are too noble, because they are too important.

Edward Paschetta

Sylvania Hdtv Problems With Dvd Player

Between 10 and 12 March, thanks to Nicole dr.sa Cioli, Health Education Unit Ref 6
Area ASL Bassa Val di Cecina, we had the opportunity to meet with three classes of junior high Castellina Marittima, Riparbella and Montescudaio.
The meeting was very interesting to both boys and teachers have shown great care and sensitivity to the issue of road safety.
Revitalizing thanks to those who have made this meeting possible, we hope to be able to leave a mark in the participants that makes them think about what are the dangers in store for us that the road every day. Thanks also to West
Audio Piombino who offered the video projector.

MONTESCUDAIO

RIPARBELLA

CASTELLINA MARITIME

Best Point And Shoot With Fast Shutter Speed

AIDS

Embroidery Shops In Chicago

RIFLESSIONI SULL'UNIVERSITA'

March 30: Il Sole 24 Ore published numbers are part of the Reform of "rationalization" of public universities. The data, very quickly, say 2283 degree programs monitored by the ministry, 221 courses at risk of cutting or consolidation (9.7% of total), 3378 addresses the degree held under observation; 1150, the number of courses degree at risk of cutting or consolidation (34% of the total).

The whole article explores these issues in detail.

The question is: are the basics for a good university reform? Gelmini is certainly not playing by the acclaimed university students despite the cuts in funding for research were due to the budget "to Tremonti, the Minister of Education has suffered the most violent attacks. But what it means to streamline the university? Cut fellowships and research or reconstruct the structure? I think that the last news show at least an attempt to change the structure, procedura fondamentale per una riforma seria. Ma come si potrebbe procedere? Altri tagli, altro risparmio, o magari attivarsi per sostenere la meritocrazia, il buon insegnamento, le strutture efficienti e la possibilità di un assorbimento dei neo-laureati nel mercato del lavoro? Come agire sulle facoltà, i corsi di laurea, il numero di iscritti e i fondi insufficienti per una buona ricerca?

Alessio

Save The Date, Birthdayquotes

MANIFESTAZIONE 5 APRILE

Pain In Ear When Laughing

INCONTRO PRE-GONGRESSUALE E MANIFESTAZIONE

Si terrà domani mattina in Piazzale Loreto l'incontro con i compagni lombardi in vista del Congresso regionale of FGS.

the day Sunday, April 5 will also take place in Piazza della Scala, a demonstration against racism which will include many of the cultural world including pesonal also Moni Ovadia.

Olive Oil And Androgenic Alopecia

LIBERTA' DI SCEGLIERE

The Berlusconi government has Senate approved a bill that takes away an opportunity for anyone to decide on his life and his end. We wanted make it mandatory nutrition and hydration enforced even when the person does not accept an aggressive treatment became unbearable, or when life is no longer such, but has turned into pure vegetative survival that the individual concerned had ruled they want for themselves. was also approved an amendment to the 'UDC whereby your doctor may not use the statement in advance of patient care . Among the opposition parties, Democratic Party and Italy of Values, on this bill have given to individual legislators, libertà di voto. Si dimentica così che la libertà di coscienza di un parlamentare ha un limite invalicabile: non può toglierla ad altri cittadini e ad altre cittadine. Se ciò avvenisse si verrebbe meno al fondamentale compito democratico di garantire a tutti la possibilità di decidere secondo la propria responsabilità. Ci rivolgiamo al Parlamento, a partire da coloro che si dichiarano per il rispetto della libertà di ciascuno affinché si rispettino i seguenti principi.

 

LA VITA È DI CHI LA VIVE, NON DELLO STATO

On the border between life and death, the choice to continue or discontinue treatment painful and hopeless must remain the responsibility of every individual. The personal freedom in this sphere, is among the most precious and no one can force us to abandon it. The Italian Constitution in this regard is clear: everyone has the right to health care but nobody can be forced to receive treatment against their will. The people, in all civilized countries may decide to leave and wrote to what extent they want to be treated and where it would just be more unnecessary suffering.

CITIZENS FREEDOM OF CONSCIENCE IS THE FIRST OF THE PARLIAMENTARY

The parliamentarians of the Republic can not take what does not belong to them to decide for us. Who is elected by the people can not, in the name of his own conscience, to silence the 60 million people. The freedom of the individual / and can not be placed under sequestration by the will of a thousand members of parliament or by the majority of them.

Links

http://www.abuondiritto.it/testamento_biologico.pdf

http://www.lucacoscioni.it/

http://www.corriere.it/politica/09_aprile_01/mannheimer_osservatorio_bb767118-1e7d-11de-9011-00144f02aabc.shtml